Gatekeeping Changes in the New Media Age: The Internet, Values and Practices of Journalism

Gil Baptista Ferreira

Resumo


This article re-evaluates the relevance of the concept of gatekeeping in the 21st century. Sustained in the literature on this subject, it argues that, in an age marked by new media and digital journalism, a classical understanding of the concept of gatekeeper will narrow the scope of the study of journalism and its relationship with the public.  Taking into account the predominant trends and lines of research, and analyzing practices and events that, from a political point of view, marked the most recent years, this article seeks to reflect upon new directions with civic value for the practice of journalism and on a reconfigured concept of the gatekeeper in the western word. It concludes by showing the normalization of the new media devices and their appropriateness to conventional values and practices of journalism.

Este artigo reavalia a relevância do conceito de gatekeeping no século XXI. Sustentado na literatura sobre esta matéria, argumenta que, numa era marcada pelos novos media e pelo jornalismo digital, um entendimento clássico do conceito de gatekeeper cerceará o âmbito do estudo do jornalismo e da sua relação com os públicos. Deste modo, tomando em consideração as tendências e as linhas de investigação predominantes, e analisando práticas e acontecimentos que, de um ponto de vista político, marcaram os anos mais recentes, o artigo procura equacionar novos sentidos, com valor cívico, para a ação do jornalismo e para uma noção reconfigurada do gatekeeper no mundo ocidental. Conclui mostrando a normalização e a adequação dos novos dipositivos mediáticos a valores e práticas convencionais do jornalismo.

Este artículo re-evalúa la relevancia del concepto de "gatekeeping" en el siglo XXI. Sostenido en la literatura sobre este tema, argumenta que, en una época marcada por los nuevos medios y el periodismo digital, una comprensión clásica del concepto de gatekeeper reducirá el alcance del estudio del periodismo y su relación con el público. Teniendo en cuenta las tendencias y líneas de investigación predominantes, y el análisis de las prácticas y eventos que, desde un punto de vista político, marcaron los últimos años, este artículo busca reflexionar sobre nuevas direcciones con valor cívico para la práctica del periodismo y sobre un concepto reconfigurado del gatekeeper en el mundo occidental. Concluye mostrando la normalización de los nuevos dispositivos y su adecuación a los valores y prácticas convencionales del periodismo.

Palavras-chave


Gatekeeper; New Media; Journalism; Digital Journalism; Norms

Texto completo:

PDF (English) PDF (PT)

Referências


Bardoel, J. (1996). Beyond Journalism. A Profession between Information Society and Civil Society. European Journal of Communication 11 (3), pp. 283-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0267323196011003001

Bardoel, J., Deuze, M., (2001). Network Journalism: Converging Competences of Media Professionals and Professionalism. Australian Journalism Review 23 (2), pp. 91-103.

Bentivegna, S. & Marchetti, R. (2017). Journalists at a crossroads: Are traditional norms and practices challenged by Twitter? Journalism, pp. 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1464884917716594

Bro, P. & Wallberg. F. (2015). Gatekeeping in a Digital Era: Principles, Practices and Technological Gatekeeping. New Media & Society 16 (4), pp. 1–17. DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.928468

Bruns, A. (2011). Gatekeeping, gatewatching, real-time feedback: new challenges for Journalism. Brasilian Journalism Research, 10 (2), pp. 119-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v10n2.2014.778

Charles, A. (2012). Interactivity: New media, politics and society. Oxford: Peter Lang.

Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6 (4), pp. 442–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1464884905056815

Deuze, M. (2006). O jornalismo e os novos meios de comunicação social. Comunicação e Sociedade, vol. 9-10. pp. 15-37. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17231/comsoc.9(2006).1152

Ferreira, G. B. (2013). Does community participation set the local press agenda? A view on deliberative and civic practices in the Portuguese press. Brazilian Journalism Research, 9(2), pp. 192-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v9n2.2013.543

Foster, R. (2012). News plurality in a Digital World, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

Hall, J. (2001). Online Journalism. London: Pluto Press.

Heinderyckx, F. (2015). Gatekeeping Theory Redux. In T. P. Vos, F. Heinderyckx (Eds.), Gatekeeping in Transition (pp. 253–267). New York, NY: Routledge.

Hermida, A. (2011a). Fluid Spaces, Fluid Journalism: The role of the “active recipient” in participatory journalism. In J. B. Singer, A. Hermida, D. Domingo, A. Heinonen, S. Paulussen, T. Quandt, Z. Reich, & M. Vujnovic (Eds.), Participatory journalism: Guarding open gates at online newspapers (pp. 177-191). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Hermida, A. (2011b). Mechanisms of participation: How audience options shape the conversation. In J. B. Singer, A. Hermida, D. Domingo, A. Heinonen, S. Paulussen, T. Quandt, Z. Reich, & M. Vujnovic (Eds.), Participatory journalism: Guarding open gates at online newspapers (pp. 11-33). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Kovach, B. & Rosenstiel, T. (2004). Os Elementos do Jornalismo, Porto: Porto Editora.

Lasorsa, D.L., Lewis, S. C., Holton, A.E. (2011). Normalizing Twitter: journalism practice in an emerging communication space. Journalism Studies 13(1) pp. 19–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2011.571825

Moreno, J. & Cardoso, G. (2016). Os desafios do jornalismo em rede. In G. Cardoso, C. Magno, T. M. Soares & Crespo, M. (Eds.), Modelos de Negócio e Comunicação Social (pp. 283-354), Coimbra, Almedina.

Newman, N. (2011). Mainstream media and the distribution of news in the age of social discovery, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

Nip, J. Y. M. (2006). Exploring the second phase of public journalism. Journalism Studies, 7(2), pp. 212-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500533528

Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A Private Sphere: Democracy in a. Digital Age. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

Parisier, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble. New York: Penguin Press.

Pettitt, T. (2012), Bracketing the Gutenberg Parenthesis. Explorations in Media Ecology 11(2), pp. 95–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/eme.11.2.95_1

Schudson, M. (1999). What public journalism knows about journalism but doesn't know about the public. In T. Glasser (Ed.), The idea of public journalism (pp. 118-133). New York: Guilford Press.

Shoemaker, P. and Vos, T.P. (2009). Gatekeeping Theory. London: Routledge

Siapera, E. (2012) Understanding New Media. London: SAGE.

Singer, J. B. (2014). User-Generated Visibility: Secondary Gatekeeping in a Shared Media Space. New Media & Society 16 (1): pp. 5–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444813477833

Tandoc Jr. & Vos, T. P. (2015). The Journalist is Marketing the News. Journalism Practice, 10: pp. 1–17. DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1087811

Tandoc, E. C. (2014). Journalism is Twerking? How Web Analytics is Changing the Process of Platforms. Journalism Practice 9 (1), pp. 92–105.

Viner, C. (2016). How technology disrupted the truth. The Guardian, 12 jul. 2016. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/jul/12/how-technology-disrupted-the-truth.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v14n2.2018.1026

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


ISSN da versão online: 1981-9854

ISSN da versão impressa (descontinuada a partir de 2008): 1808-4079



Datas de publicação da revista

30 de abril - 30 de agosto - 30 de dezembro

 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.