THEORIZING IDEOLOGY AS AN INTEGRAL FRAMEWORK FOR STUDYING THE SOCIOLOGICAL DEMARCATION OF JOURNALISM
PDF

Keywords

Boundary work
Collective memory
Demarcation
Ideology
Paradigm repair

How to Cite

Villagrán Sánchez, Álvaro, & Lopéz Pan, F. (2026). THEORIZING IDEOLOGY AS AN INTEGRAL FRAMEWORK FOR STUDYING THE SOCIOLOGICAL DEMARCATION OF JOURNALISM. Brazilian Journalism Research, 21(3), e1906. https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v21n3.2025.1906

Abstract

ABSTRACT – This article develops a novel theoretical framework for studying the sociological demarcation of journalism through the lens of ideology. Drawing on Paul Ricoeur’s theory of ideology as a necessary symbolic structure for community integration and authority legitimation, and complementing it with Susan Gal’s and Judith Irvine’s semiotic model of iconicity, recursiveness, and erasure, we reinterpret key journalistic practices — collective memory, boundary work, and paradigm repair — as interrelated ideological operations. Our argument highlights how ideological processes simultaneously foster cohesion within the journalistic field, legitimize journalism’s cultural and cognitive role, and risk distorting self-representations to resist change. By synthesizing Ricoeur’s hermeneutic approach with semiotic theory, this article bridges various research traditions and offers a more integrative understanding of how journalism’s sociological demarcation is constructed, contested, and maintained.

RESUMO – Este artigo desenvolve um novo arcabouço teórico para o estudo da demarcação sociológica do jornalismo a partir da perspectiva da ideologia. Com base na teoria da ideologia de Paul Ricoeur — concebida como uma estrutura simbólica necessária para a integração comunitária e a legitimação da autoridade — e complementando-a com o modelo semiótico de iconicidade, recursividade e apagamento proposto por Susan Gal e Judith Irvine, reinterpretamos práticas jornalísticas centrais — memória coletiva, boundary work e paradigm repair — como operações ideológicas inter-relacionadas. Nosso argumento destaca como os processos ideológicos promovem simultaneamente a coesão no campo jornalístico, legitimam o papel cultural e cognitivo do jornalismo e correm o risco de distorcer as autorrepresentações para resistir à mudança. Ao sintetizar a abordagem hermenêutica de Ricoeur com a teoria semiótica, este artigo estabelece pontes entre diferentes tradições de pesquisa e oferece uma compreensão mais integrada de como a demarcação sociológica do jornalismo é construída, contestada e mantida.

RESUMEN – Este artículo desarrolla un marco teórico para el estudio de la demarcación sociológica del periodismo desde la perspectiva de la ideología. Basándonos en la teoría de la ideología de Paul Ricoeur — concebida como una estructura simbólica necesaria para la integración comunitaria y la legitimación de la autoridad —, y complementándola con el modelo semiótico de iconicidad, recursividad y borramiento propuesto por Susan Gal y Judith Irvine, reinterpretamos prácticas periodísticas clave — memoria colectiva, boundary work y paradigm repair — como operaciones ideológicas interrelacionadas. Nuestro argumento destaca cómo la ideología promueve la cohesión del campo periodístico, legitima el papel cultural del periodismo y, al mismo tiempo, conlleva el riesgo de distorsionar sus autorrepresentaciones como forma de resistencia al cambio. Al sintetizar el enfoque hermenéutico de Ricoeur con la teoría semiótica, este artículo tiende puentes entre tradiciones y ofrece una comprensión más integrada de cómo se construye, disputa y mantiene la demarcación sociológica del periodismo.

https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v21n3.2025.1906
PDF

References

Adams, S. (2015). On Ricœur’s Shift from a Hermeneutics of Culture to a Cultural Hermeneutics. Études Ricoeuriennes/Ricoeur Studies, 6(2), 130–153. DOI: 10.5195/errs.2015.312

Bennett, W. L., Gressett, L. A., & Haltom, W. (1985). Repairing the News: A Case Study of the News Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 35(2), 50–68. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02233.x

Berkowitz, D., & Gutsche, R. E. (2012). Drawing Lines in the Journalistic Sand: Jon Stewart, Edward R. Murrow, and Memory of News Gone By. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(4), 643–656. DOI: 10.1177/1077699012456020

Bocheński, J. M. (1979). ¿Qué es la autoridad? Introducción a la lógica de la autoridad. Herder.

Carlson, M. (2006). War Journalism and the “KIA Journalist”: The Cases of David Bloom and Michael Kelly. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 23(2), 91–111. DOI: 10.1080/07393180600714471

Carlson, M. (2007). Making Memories Matter: Journalistic Authority and the Memorializing Discourse around Mary McGrory and David Brinkley. Journalism, 8(2), 165–183. DOI: 10.1177/1464884907074804

Carlson, M. (2009). The Reality of a Fake Image: News Norms, Photojournalistic Craft, and Brian Walski’s Fabricated Photograph. Journalism Practice, 3(2), 125–139. DOI: 10.1080/17512780802681140

Carlson, M. (2014). Gone, But Not Forgotten: Memories of Journalistic Deviance as Metajournalistic Discourse. Journalism Studies, 15(1), 33–47. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2013.790620

Carlson, M. (2016). Metajournalistic Discourse and the Meanings of Journalism: Definitional Control, Boundary Work, and Legitimation. Communication Theory, 26(4), 349–368. DOI: 10.1111/comt.12088

Carlson, M. (2017). Journalistic Authority: Legitimating News in the Digital Era. Columbia University Press. DOI: 10.7312/carl17444

Carlson, M. (2023). Journalists, Epistemology, and Authority. In S. Allan (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to News and Journalism (2nd ed.) (pp. 64–72). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003174790-8

Carlson, M., & Berkowitz, D. A. (2014). The Late News: Memory Work as Boundary Work in the Commemoration of Television Journalists. In B. Zelizer & K. Tenenboim-Weinblatt (Eds.), Journalism and memory (pp. 195–210). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781137263940_13

Cecil, M. (2002). Bad Apples: Paradigm Overhaul and the CNN/Time “Tailwind” Story. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 26(1), 46–58. DOI: 10.1177/019685990202600104

Deuze, M. (2005). What is Journalism? Professional Identity and Ideology of Journalists Reconsidered. Journalism, 6(4), 442–464. DOI: 10.1177/1464884905056815

Donsbach, W. (2014). Journalism as the New Knowledge Profession and Consequences for Journalism Education. Journalism, 15(6), 661–677. DOI: 10.1177/1464884913491347

Eason, D. L. (1986). On Journalistic Authority: The Janet Cooke Scandal. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 3(4), 429–447. DOI: 10.1080/15295038609366674

Evans, R. (2005). Introduction: Demarcation Socialized: Constructing Boundaries and Recognizing Difference. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30(1), 3–16. DOI: 10.1177/0162243904270713

Freeden, M. (1996). Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Clarendon Press.

Freeden, M. (2015). Liberalism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/actrade/9780199670437.001.0001

Gal, S., & Irvine, J. T. (1995). The Boundaries of Languages and Disciplines: How Ideologies Construct Difference. Social Research, 62(4), 967–1001. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/40971131

Gerring, J. (1997). Ideology: A Definitional Analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 50(4), 957–994. DOI: 10.1177/106591299705000412

Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795. DOI: 10.2307/2095325

Henrichsen, J. (2023). When Distancing Fails – How Journalists’ Discursive and Mnemonic Techniques Facilitated the rise of Trump and Trumpism. International Journal of Communication, 17, 3743–3761. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/19842

Hermida, A. (2019). The Existential Predicament When Journalism Moves Beyond Journalism. Journalism, 20(1), 177–180. DOI: 10.1177/1464884918807367

Hindman, E. B. (2005). Jayson Blair, The New York Times, and Paradigm Repair. Journal of Communication, 55(2), 225–241. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02669.x

Kitch, C. (2014). Historical Authority and the “Potent Journalistic Reputation”: A Longer View of Legacy-Making in American News Media. In B. Zelizer & K. Tenenboim-Weinblatt (Eds.), Journalism and memory (pp. 227–241). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781137263940_15

Lewis, S. C. (2012). The Tension Between Professional Control and Open Participation: Journalism and its Boundaries. Information, Communication & Society, 15(6), 836–866. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.674150

Loosen, W., Ahva, L., Reimer, J., Solbach, P., Deuze, M., & Matzat, L. (2020). “X Journalism”: Exploring Journalism’s Diverse Meanings Through the Names We Give It. Journalism, 23(1), 39–58. DOI: 10.1177/1464884920950090

Mannheim, K. (2019). Ideología y utopía: Introducción a la sociología del conocimiento (4th ed.). Fondo de Cultura Económica. (Original work published 1936)

Mesbahian, H. (2008). From Suspicion to Affirmation: Paul Ricoeur and a Genetic Phenomenology of Ideology. Falsafeh (Journal of Philosophy), 36(1), 21–47. Retrieved from https://mesbahian.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/PDF-104.pdf

Mulkay, M. J. (1976). Norms and Ideology in Science. Social Science Information, 15(4-5), 637–656. DOI: 10.1177/053901847601500406

Ricoeur, P. (1976). Ideology and Utopia as Cultural Imagination. Philosophic Exchange, 7(1), 16–28. Retrieved from https://files01.core.ac.uk/download/pdf/233574024.pdf

Ricoeur, P. (2019). Ideología y utopía (2nd ed.). Editorial Gedisa. (Original work published 1986)

Schudson, M. (1992). Watergate in American Memory: How We Remember, Forget, and Reconstruct the Past. Basic Books.

Singer, J. B. (2005). The Political J-Blogger: “Normalizing” A New Media Form to Fit Old Norms and Practices. Journalism, 6(2), 173–198. DOI: 10.1177/1464884905051009

Velloso, C. (2025). Traditional Journalism Norms Revisited: Journalistic Reconceptualizations of Objectivity. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 50(1), 52-72. DOI: 10.1177/01968599251325847

Villagrán Sánchez, A., & López Pan, F. (2025). Journalism, the Sociology of Knowledge, and Science Studies: A Narrative Literature Review. Journalism, 0(0). DOI: 10.1177/14648849251358911

Vos, T. P., & Moore, J. (2020). Building the Journalistic Paradigm: Beyond Paradigm Repair. Journalism, 21(1), 17–33. DOI: 10.1177/1464884918767586

Vos, T. P., & Thomas, R. J. (2018). The Discursive Construction of Journalistic Authority in a Post-Truth Age. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 2.001–2.010. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2018.1492879

Zelizer, B. (1993). Journalists as Interpretive Communities. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 10(3), 219–237. DOI: 10.1080/15295039309366865

Zelizer, B. (2018). Resetting Journalism in the Aftermath of Brexit and Trump. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 140–156. DOI: 10.1177/0267323118760318

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Brazilian journalism research