James Curran’s article “Entertaining democracy in the Era of Neo-liberalism” is an essay written from the 13th SBPJor Conference Meeting in Campo Grande in 2015; a conference in which he was the opening speaker. The article was approved for publication in the BJR at the end of 2015, but we have decided to publish it in a special edition of Journalism and Democracy as it deals precisely with this issue. Curran begins the article by questioning the current state of democracy as it pertains to the decline of the nation state and the emergence of transnational institutions of deliberation which he calls “multilevel governance” but “is not matched by the development of a multilevel sense of citizenship”. As almost a prelude to the Brexit, Curran draws attention to the fact that the English do not consider themselves European despite being a part of the European Union. He tied this nationalist ideal not only to the British, but to other country populations in general. In a world dominated by transnational corporations and the presence and constancy of national media “supporting a national identity” he predicted that “Attempts at new institutional building are out of step with media development”. His analysis highlights several problems that are weakening modern democracy like “the increasing centralization of power by political leaders” and the “increasingly unrepresentative nature of the political class rendering them in some countries almost a ‘separate caste’”. Reading Curran’s text allows us to reflect on the situation in Brazil. At first, it is pessimistic and places meanings that we have lobbied for outside of our borders: “Governments are less able to govern; political power is becoming more centralized; and the unelected influence of big business is becoming greater”. The media also has a hand in contributing towards a “growing sense of disconnection from politics”, making reference to politics as a linear universe dominated by the elite. After further analysis of the contrasting possibilities that the Internet brings as well as its role in constructing news in public systems, Curran offers a slightly more positive outlook: “liberal democracy is in disrepair, and the media are implicated in its malaise. The rise of the internet offers some relief, as does an enduring political experiment – public service broadcasting.” Once more, there is no way to not compare his perspective with what is happening in Brazil nowadays; we are fighting for the hope of building an effective and autonomous public system. Lastly, Curran places importance on starting to think about politics from new vantage points, especially for creating policies and media entertainment. Once again, we can see similarities in Brazil. This understanding is common among our researchers, such as the numerous research spaces which work on this correlation. But, after tracing a series of inferences on specific materials, Curran puts forth a direct and definite conclusion: “A healthy democracy needs to be informed as well as entertained”.
AALBERG, T.; CURRAN, J. (Eds.). How Media Inform Democracy. London: Routledge, 2012.
AALBERG, T. et al. International TV News, Foreign Affairs Interest and Public Knowledge. Journalism Studies, 14 (3), p. 387-406, 2013.
AFRICA Stats. In: INTERNET WORLD STATS – IWS. Database. 2015a. Avaliable in: < http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats1.htm>. Access on: Aug. 10 2016.
ASIA Stats. In: INTERNET WORLD STATS – IWS. Database. 2015b. Avaliable in: < http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats3.htm>. Access on: Aug. 10 2016.
COHEN, A. Where in the World is the Global Village?. In: A. Cohen (Ed.). Foreign News on Television. New York: Peter Lang, 2013, p. 129-150.
CURRAN, J. Media and Democracy. London: Routledge, 2011.
CURRAN, J.; IYENGAR, S.; LUND, A.; SALOVAARA-MORING, I. Media Reporting, Public Knowledge and Democracy: A Comparative Study. European Journal of Communication, 24 (1), p. 5-26, 2009.
J. CURRAN, J., COEN, S., AALBERG, T.; SHANTO, I. News Content, Media Consumption and Current Affairs Knowledge. In: T. Aalberg & J. Curran (Eds.). How Media Inform Democracy. London: Routledge, 2012, pp. 81-97.
CURRAN, J et al. Reconsidering “Virtuous Circle” and “Media Malaise” Theories of the Media: An 11-Nation Study. Journalism, 15 (7), p. 815-833, 2014.
CURRAN, J.; FENTON, N.; FREEDMAN, D. Misunderstanding the Internet. 2. Ed. London: Routledge, 2016.
DELLI CARPINI, M.; KEETER, S. What Americans Know and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996.
DI GENARRO, C.; DUTTON, W. The Internet and the Public: Online and Offline Political Participation in the United Kingdom. Parliamentary Affairs, 59 (2), p. 299-313, 2006.
ELMER-DEWITT, P. Battle for the Soul of the Internet. Time, 144 (4), p. 50-57, 1994.
ESSER, F.; STROMBACK, J. (Eds.) Mediatization of Politics. Biggleswade: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
GROSSMAN, L. The Electronic Republic: Reshaping Democracy in the Information Age. New York: Viking, 1995.
JURIS, J. Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere: Social Media, Public Space, and Emerging Logics of Aggregation. American Ethnologist, 39(2), p. 259-279, 2012.
KOHUT, A.; DOHERTY, C.; DIMOCK, M.; KEETER, S. In Changing News Landscape, even Television is Vulnerable. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2012. Avaliable in: http://www.people-press.org/2012/09/27/in-changing-news-landscape-even-television-is-vulnerable/. Access on: May 30 2015.
NEWMAN, N.; LEVY, D. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2014: Tracking the Future of News’. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. University of Oxford, 2014. Avaliable in: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Reuters%20Institute%20Digital%20News%20Report%202014.pdf. Access on: Jun. 10 2015.
MIDDLE EAST Stats. In: INTERNET WORLD STATS – IWS. Database. 2015c. Avaliable in: < http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats5.htm>. Access on: Aug. 10 2016.
NIELSEN, R.; SCHRØDER, K. The Relative Importance of Social Media for Accessing, Finding, and Engaging with News. Digital Journalism, 2(4), p. 472-489, 2014.
POSTER, M. What’s the Matter with the Internet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001.
REDDEN, J.; WITSCHGE, T. A New News Order? Online News Content Examined. In: N. Fenton (Ed.). New Media, Old News. London: Sage, 2010, p. 171-186.
SCHUDSON, M. The Good Citizen. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1998.
SCHWARTZ, E. Power to the People: The Clinton Administration is Using the Net in a Pitched Effort to Perform an End Run Around the Media. Wired, 1 January, 1994. Avaliable in: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.12/whitehouse_pr.html. Access on: Jan. 10 2010.
SEYBERT, H.; REINECKE, P. Internet Use Statistics – Individuals. Statistics in Focus, Eurostat, European Commission, 2013. Avaliable in: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Internet_use_statistics_-_individuals. Access on: May 30 2015.
SMITH, A. Civic Engagement in the Digital Age. Pew Research Center, 2013. Avaliable in:
http://pewinter-net.org/Reports/2013/Civic-Engagement.aspx. Access on: Jun. 1 2015.
SOROKA, S. et al. Auntie Knows Best? Public Broadcasting and Public Affairs Knowledge. British Journal of Political Science, 43 (4), p. 719-739, 2013.
TIFFEN, R. et al. Sources in the News: A Comparative Study. Journalism Studies, 15 (4), p. 374-391, 2014.
ZALLER, J. The Nature and Origins of Public Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.