False, inaccurate and incomplete news: challenges facing journalists involuntary rectification. The Spanish experience
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Credibility
voluntary rectification
accurate information
journalism quality
ethic

How to Cite

López Hidalgo, A., & Fernández Barrero, Ángeles. (2012). False, inaccurate and incomplete news: challenges facing journalists involuntary rectification. The Spanish experience. Brazilian Journalism Research, 8(2), 212–236. https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v8n2.2012.326

Abstract

Journalists must verify information provided by their sources. However, factors such as job precariousness, urgency and the credibility they give to mainly institutional sources mean that journalists do not verify information. Most codes of conduct recommend the duty to correct information as soon as an unintentionally committed error is discovered, but journalists dislike recognising their own errors and even more so correcting them publicly. These circumstances affect adversely the quality of discourse and the credibility of mass-media. Ombudsmen partially bridge this gap. As a result, false, mistaken, wrong or biased pieces of news are published and journalists, against the rules of truth and honesty, rarely rectify on their own initiative. This article analyses the coverage of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction, in which the game of mimicry saw the same mistake repeated in different media and in different countries, although prestigious newspapers published an unusual public apology.

https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v8n2.2012.326
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.

 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.