Resumo
RESUMO – Este estudo avalia o grau de visibilidade do grupo BRICS, de seus estados membros e dos temas a eles relacionados dentro da esfera pública brasileira. O arcabouço teórico centra-se no papel do jornalismo em monitorar sistemas estrangeiros por meio de coberturas internacionais. Além disso, consideramos a estrutura tradicional do jornalismo internacional para discutir os possíveis fatores que moldam a visibilidade midiática dos países do BRICS. A partir de uma análise de conteúdo quantitativa e longitudinal (2011-2019), examinamos 1.451 matérias publicadas pelos jornais O Estado de S. Paulo e O Globo. A imprensa brasileira discute, principalmente, potências globais, países em crise, estados vizinhos e os principais parceiros comerciais do Brasil. A China (5.1%) é o país dos BRICS com mais visibilidade, provavelmente devido ao seu poderio geopolítico e fortes laços econômicos com o Brasil. Questões relacionadas à Rússia (4.1%), especialmente aquelas envolvendo segurança e justiça, também recebem foco considerável. Temas envolvendo a Índia (1%) e a África do Sul (0.8%) recebem significativamente menos atenção midiática. O próprio bloco BRICS exibe uma visibilidade relativamente baixa, o que pode dificultar o seu reconhecimento entre o público brasileiro.
ABSTRACT – This study assesses the visibility of BRICS, its member states, and associated themes within the Brazilian-mediated public sphere. The theoretical framework centers on the role of journalism in monitoring foreign systems through foreign news coverage. Additionally, we consider the traditional structure of foreign reporting to discuss the potential factors shaping the media salience of the BRICS constellation. By conducting a quantitative and longitudinal (2011-2019) content analysis, we examined 1,451 articles from the newspapers O Estado de S. Paulo and O Globo. The Brazilian press primarily discusses global powers, crisis regions, neighboring states, and Brazil’s key trade partners. China (5.1%) receives the most coverage among BRICS countries, likely due to its geopolitical power and strong economic ties with Brazil. Russia-related issues (4.1%), particularly those involving security and justice, also receive considerable focus. Conversely, Indian (1%) and South African (0.8%) issues receive noticeably less coverage. The BRICS bloc itself exhibits relatively low visibility, potentially hindering its recognition among the Brazilian public.
RESUMEN – Este estudio evalúa el grado de visibilidad del grupo BRICS, sus estados miembros y los temas relacionados con ellos dentro de la esfera pública brasileña. El marco teórico se centra en el papel del periodismo en el monitoreo de sistemas extranjeros a través de la cobertura internacional. Además, se considera la estructura tradicional del periodismo internacional para discutir los posibles factores que dan forma a la visibilidad mediática de los países del BRICS. Mediante un análisis de contenido cuantitativo y longitudinal, se examinaron 1.451 artículos publicados por los periódicos O Estado de S. Paulo y O Globo. La prensa brasileña discute principalmente potencias globales, países en crisis, estados vecinos y principales socios comerciales. China (5.1%) es el país del BRICS con mayor visibilidad, probablemente debido a su poder geopolítico y fuertes lazos económicos con Brasil Los temas relacionados con Rusia (4.1%), las relacionadas con la seguridad y la justicia, también reciben una atención considerable. Los temas relacionados con la India (1%) y Sudáfrica (0.8%) reciben significativamente menos atención. El propio bloque BRICS exhibe una visibilidad relativamente baja, lo que puede dificultar su reconocimiento entre el público brasileño.
Referências
Aalberg, T., Papathanassopoulos, S., Soroka, S., Curran, J., Hayashi, K., Iyengar, S., Tiffen, R. (2013). International TV News, Foreign Affairs Interest and Public Knowledge: A Comparative Study of Foreign News Coverage and Public Opinion in 11 Countries. Journalism Studies, 14(3), 387–406. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2013.765636
Albuquerque, A. de. (2011). On Models and Margins: Comparative Media Models Viewed from a Brazilian Perspective. In D. C. Hallin & P. Mancini (Eds.), Comparing Media Systems beyond the Western World (pp. 72–95). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139005098.006
Albuquerque, A. de, & Lycarião, D. (2018). Winds of Change? BRICS as a Perspective in International Media Research. International Journal of Communication, 12, 2873–2892. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/8549
Altmeppen, K. D. (2010). The Gradual Disappearance of Foreign News on German Television: Is there a Future for Global, International, World or Foreign News? Journalism Studies, 11(4), 567–576. DOI: 10.1080/14616701003638459
Bomfim, I. (2016). Between a New Architecture and the Reaffirming of Hegemonic Power Structures: Veja’s Portal Coverage of the Establishment of BRICS (2005-2010). Brazilian Journalism Research, 12(1), 98–117. DOI: 10.25200/BJR.v12n1.2016.938
Borger, J. (2023, August 24). BRICS to more than Double with Admission of Six New Countries. The Guardian. Retrieved from www.theguardian.com/business/2023/aug/24/five-brics-nations-announce-admission-of-six-new-countries-to-bloc
Cazzamatta, R., & Santos, A. (2023). “Democratically Elected Caudillo”: Western Media Coverage on Venezuela and the Era Chávez – Empirical Insights from Germany. Journalism Practice, 1–23. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2023.2232770
Cazzamatta, R. (2020). Lateinamerikaberichterstattung der deutschen Presse: Struktur und Entstehungsbedingungen. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
Christians, C. G., Glasser, L. T., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K., & White, R. A. (2009). Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies. University of Illinois Press.
Dwyer, T., & Arifon, O. (2019). Recognition and Transformation: Beyond Media Discourses on the BRICS. Global Media and Communication, 15(1), 27–47. DOI: 10.1177/1742766518818858
Ebert, H., & Flemes, D. (2018). Regional Leadership and Contestation: Strategic Reactions to the Rise of the BRICS. In H. Ebert & D. Flemes (Eds.), Regional Powers and Contested Leadership (pp. 1–59). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-73691-4_1
Fernandes, I. F., Freitas, V. R. A. de, & Onuki, J. (2021). The BRICS and Brazilian Public Opinion: Soft Balancing or Economic Strategy? Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 64(2), e012. DOI: 10.1590/0034-7329202100212
Freire, M. R. (2020). Political Dynamics within the BRICS in the Context of Multilayered Global Governance. In M. Larionova & J. J. Kirton (Eds.), BRICS and Global Governance (pp. 70–88). Routledge.
g1. (2022, April 4). Balança comercial: Veja ranking dos principais parceiros do Brasil em 2021. g1. Retrieved from www.g1.globo.com/economia/noticia/2022/01/04/balanca-comercial-veja-ranking-dos-principais-parceiros-do-brasil-em-2021.ghtml
Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The Structure of Foreign News: The Presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus Crises in Four Norwegian Newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1), 64–90. DOI: 10.1177/002234336500200104
Golan, G. (2006). Inter-media Agenda Setting and Global News Coverage: Assessing the Influence of the New York Times on Three Network Television Evening News Programs. Journalism Studies, 7(2), 323–333. DOI: 10.1080/14616700500533643
Golan, G. J. (2010). Determinants of International News Coverage. In G. J. Golan, T. J. Johnson, & W. Wanta (Eds.), International Media Communication in a Global Age (pp. 125–144). Routledge.
Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Polity.
Hafez, K. (2007). The Myth of Media Globalization. Polity Press.
Hafez, K., & Grüne, A. (2022). Foundations of Global Communication. Routledge.
Hanitzsch, T., Goodrum, A., Quandt, T., & von Pape, T. (2013). Interest in Foreign News. In A. A. Cohen & A. Belo (Eds.), Foreign News on Television: Where in the World is the Global Village? (pp. 171–190). Lang.
Harig, C., & Jenne, N. (2022). Whose Rules? Whose Power? The Global South and the Possibility to Shape International Peacekeeping Norms through Leadership Appointments. Review of International Studies, 48(4), 646–667. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210522000262
Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the Fall for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. DOI: 10.1080/19312450709336664
Heimprecht, C. (2017). Determinanten der Auslandsberichterstattung: Eine Mehrebenenanalyse des internationalen Nachrichtenflusses. Springer VS.
Herscovitz, H. (2019). Leading Newspapers in Brazil as Political Actors (1994-present). Estudios Interdisciplinarios de América Latina y El Caribe, 30(2), 93–122. DOI: 10.61490/eial.v30i2.1629
Hurrelmann, A., & Wagner, A. (2020). Did the Eurozone Crisis Undermine the European Union’s Legitimacy? An Analysis of Newspaper Reporting, 2009–2014. Comparative European Politics, 18(5), 707–728. DOI: 10.1057/s41295-020-00205-6
Juutinen, M., & Käkönen, J. (2020). The BRICS Paradox. In D. K. Thussu & K. Nordenstreng (Eds.), BRICS Media: Reshaping the Global Communication Order? (pp. 24–38). Routledge.
Kamps, K. (2008). Nachrichtengeografie. In O. Hahn, J. Lönnendonker, & R. Schröder (Eds.), Deutsche Auslandskorrespondenten: Ein Handbuch (pp. 80-98). UVK-Verl.-Ges.
Koopmans, R., & Erbe, J. (2004). Towards a European Public Sphere?: Vertical and Horizontal Dimensions of Europeanized Political Communication. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 17(2), 97–118. DOI: 10.1080/1351161042000238643
Larionova, M. (2020). Looking into the Future of BRICS. In M. Larionova & J. J. Kirton (Eds.), BRICS and Global Governance (pp. 264–274). Routledge.
Lee, F. (2022, June 24). Wo China größter Player ist. Zeit Online. Retrieved from www.zeit.de/politik/2022-06/brics-gipfel-china-russland-g7
Matos, C. (2016). Media Reform in Latin America Revisited: Where do We Go from here? In T. Flew, P. Iosifidis, & J. Steemers (Eds.), Global Media and National Policies (pp. 156–172). Palgrave Macmillan UK. DOI: 10.1057/9781137493958_10
McCombs, M. E. (2014). Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion (2nd edition). Polity.
Meio & Mensagem. (2022, February 2). Jornais: Circulação digital sobe e impressa cai em 2021. Retrieved from www.meioemensagem.com.br/midia/jornais-circulacao-digital-sobe-e-impressa-cai-em-2021
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Robertson, C. T., Arguedas, A. R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2024). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2024. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2024-06/RISJ_DNR_2024_Digital_v10%20lr.pdf
Otto, F., & Meyer, C. O. (2012). Missing the Story? Changes in Foreign News Reporting and their Implications for Conflict Prevention. Media, War & Conflict, 5(3), 205-221. DOI: 10.1177/1750635212458621
Paulino, F. O., & Guazina, L. S. (2020). The Brazilian Media System in a Turbulent Environment. In K. Nordenstreng & D. K. Thussu (Eds.), BRICS Media: Reshaping the Global Communication Order? (pp. 75 – 89). Routledge.
Peters, B. (2006). Public Discourse, Identity and the Problem of Democratic Legitimacy. In E. O. Eriksen & J. E. Fossum (Eds.), Making the European Polity: Reflexive Integration in the EU (pp. 84–121). Routledge.
Reinemann, C. (2003). Medienmacher als Mediennutzer: Kommunikations- und Einflussstrukturen im politischen Journalismus der Gegenwart. Böhlau.
Riffe, D., Aust, C. F., & Lacy, S. R. (1993). The Effectiveness of Random, Consecutive Day and Constructed Week Sampling in Newspaper Content Analysis. Journalism Quarterly, 70(1), 133–139. DOI: 10.1177/107769909307000115
Rössler, P. (2017). Inhaltsanalyse. UVK Verlag.
Salzman, R. S. (2019). Russia, BRICS, and the Disruption of Global Order. Georgetown University Press.
Santos, A., & Cazzamatta, R. (2024). Who Shapes Mediated Conversations Among Rising Global Powers? Examining News Geography, Authorship, and Media Sources Within the BRICS Framework. The International Journal of Press/Politics. Advance online publication.
https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612241269835
Schmitz, A. (2017). A autonomia profissional do jornalista brasileiro: Ideais e práticas nos jornais Folha de S. Paulo, O Estado de S. Paulo, O Globo e Zero Hora. Proceedings of the Congresso Brasileiro de Sociologia. Sociedade Brasileira de Sociologia. Retrieved from www.adaltech.com.br/anais/sociologia2017/listaresumos.htm
Schulz, W. (1976). Die Konstruktion von Realität in den Nachrichtenmedien: E. Analyse d. aktuellen Berichterstattung (1. Aufl). Alber.
Sodré, M., Paiva, R., Nordenstreng, K., & Custódio, L. (2020). Shifting Paradigms in Communication Research. In D. K. Thussu & K. Nordenstreng (Eds.), BRICS Media: Reshaping the Global Communication Order? (pp. 39–52). Routledge.
Sparks, C. (2014). Deconstructing the BRICS. International Journal of Communication, 8, 392–418. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2049/1074
Sreberny-Mohammadi, A. (1984). The “World of the News” Study. Journal of Communication, 34(1), 121–134. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1984.tb02990.x
Staab, J. F. (1990). The Role of News Factors in News Selection: A Theoretical Reconsideration. European Journal of Communication, 5(4), 423–443. DOI: 10.1177/0267323190005004003
Stuenkel, O. (2016). Post-western World: How Emerging Powers are Remaking Global Order. Polity.
Stuenkel, O. (2020). The BRICS and the Future of Global Order (2nd edition). Lexington Books.
Tardy, T. (2012). Emerging Powers and Peacekeeping: An Unlikely Normative Clash. GCSP Policy Paper, 3, 1–4. Retrieved from https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/141118/Emerging%20Powers%20and%20Peacekeeping.pdf
Thussu, D. K. (2020). BRICS de-Americanizing the Internet? In D. K. Thussu & K. Nordenstreng (Eds.), BRICS Media: Reshaping the Global Communication Order? (pp. 280–301). Routledge.
Thussu, D. K., & Nordenstreng, K. (2015). Introduction: Contextualizing the BRICS Media. In K. Nordenstreng & D. K. Thussu (Eds.), Mapping BRICS media (pp. 1–22). Routledge.
Thussu, D. K. (2004). Media Plenty and the Poverty of News. In C. Paterson & A. Sreberny (Eds.), International News in the 21st Century (pp. 47-62). John Libbey Publishing.
Tiele, A. (2010). Nachrichtengeographien der Tagespresse: Eine international vergleichende Nachrichtenwert-Studie. Logos.
Trenz, H.-J. (2004). Media Coverage on European Governance: Exploring the European Public Sphere in National Quality Newspapers. European Journal of Communication, 19(3), 291–319. DOI: 10.1177/0267323104045257
Ulrich, D.-C. (2016). Die Chimäre einer globalen Öffentlichkeit: Internationale Medienberichterstattung und die Legitimationskrise der Vereinten Nationen. Transcript.
Wasserman, H. (2018). Power, Meaning and Geopolitics: Ethics as an Entry Point for Global Communication Studies. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 441–451. DOI: 10.1093/joc/jqy001
Wasserman, H., Paulino, F. O., Strovsky, D., & Pietiläinen, J. (2015). Intra-BRICS Media Exchange. In K. Nordenstreng & D. K. Thussu (Eds.), Mapping BRICS Media (pp. 228–241). Routledge.
Wessler, H. (2018). Habermas and the Media. Polity.
Wessler, H., & Brüggemann, M. (2012). Transnationale Kommunikation: Eine Einführung. Springer VS.
Wessler, H., Peters, B., Bruggemann, M., Kleinen-v.Konigslow, K., & Sifft, S. (2008). Transnationalization of Public Spheres. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wilke, J., Heimprecht, C., & Cohen, A. (2012). The Geography of Foreign News on Television: A Comparative Study of 17 Countries. International Communication Gazette, 74(4), 301–322. DOI: 10.1177/1748048512439812
Wu, H. D. (2000). Systemic Determinants of International News Coverage: A Comparison of 38 Countries. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 110–130. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02844.x
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Brazilian journalism research