POLITICAL JOURNALISM BETWEEN NEWS AND OPINION: a comparative study of the 2018 Brazilian presidential elections
PDF (English)
PDF (PT) (Português (Brasil))

Mots-clés

Political journalism
News
Editorials
Elections
Public opinion

Comment citer

Santos, D. H. de F., Marques, F. P. J., & Fontes, G. S. (2020). POLITICAL JOURNALISM BETWEEN NEWS AND OPINION: a comparative study of the 2018 Brazilian presidential elections. Brazilian Journalism Research, 16(1), 122–151. https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v16n1.2020.1264

Résumé

This article compares editorial and news agendas considering O Estado de S. Paulo, Folha de S. Paulo, and O Globo newspapers during the second round of the 2018 Brazilian presidential election. We study to what extent the convergence between both agendas discloses some of the political interests sponsored by news organizations. By using content analysis, we examined the thematic convergence between 144 editorials and news. The hypotheses are: H1) The news and opinion sections within each newspaper converge thematically, indicating a political instrumentalization of the journalistic practices; H2) Newspapers differ from each other when considering the topics covered in their editorials, which is not the case when their main cover stories are at stake. The results indicate that the newspapers do not present a strong convergence within their intern sections. However, there is similarity between the opinionated agenda between the news organizations, which doesn’t happen with the news coverage.

O objetivo deste trabalho é comparar as agendas editorial e noticiosa dos jornais O Estado de S. Paulo, Folha de S.Paulo e O Globo durante o segundo turno da eleição presidencial de 2018. Pretende-se, especificamente, compreender em que medida as semelhanças entre as referidas agendas podem revelar, pelo menos em parte, os interesses políticos das publicações. A análise de conteúdo de 144 textos permitiu observar o nível de sintonia temática entre as peças jornalísticas. As hipóteses são: H1) As seções noticiosa e opinativa internas a cada jornal convergem tematicamente, indicando instrumentalização político-eleitoral da atividade jornalística; H2) Os jornais divergem entre si quando são diretamente comparados os temas abordados em seus editoriais, o que não ocorre em suas principais matérias de capa. Descobriu-se que os periódicos não apresentam convergências expressivas em suas seções internas. Todavia, há convergência entre as agendas opinativas dos jornais, diferentemente do que acontece em suas notícias.

Este artículo compara las agendas editoriales y de noticias de O Estado de S. Paulo, Folha de S.Paulo y O Globo durante la segunda vuelta de las elecciones presidenciales brasileñas de 2018, buscando identificar si hay similitudes entre ellas. El análisis de contenido de 144 editoriales y noticias nos permitió observar la armonía temática entre los textos. Las hipótesis son: H1) Las secciones de noticias y opinión dentro de cada periódico convergen temáticamente, lo que indica la instrumentalización político-electoral de la actividad periodística; H2) Los periódicos difieren entre sí cuando los temas de sus editoriales se comparan directamente, lo cual no es el caso en sus principales portadas. Se encontró que no hay convergencias temáticas expresivas en las secciones de cada publicación. Sin embargo, los resultados indican cierta convergencia entre las agendas de opinión de los periódicos, lo que no se percibe con la misma intensidad en las noticias.
https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v16n1.2020.1264
PDF (English)
PDF (PT) (Português (Brasil))

Références

Abreu, A. (2005). A mídia na transição democrática brasileira. Sociologia, problemas e práticas, n. 48, 53–65. Retrieved from www.scielo.mec.pt/pdf/spp/n48/n48a05.pdf

Albuquerque, A. (2012). O paralelismo político em questão. Revista Compolítica, 1(2), 5–28. DOI: 10.21878/compolitica.2012.2.1.23

Albuquerque, A. (2013). Em nome do público: jornalismo e política nas entrevistas dos presidenciáveis ao Jornal Nacional. E-Compós, 16(2), 1–23. DOI: 10.30962/ec.813

Aldé, A., Mendes, G., & Figueiredo, M. (2007). Tomando partido: imprensa e eleições presidenciais em 2006. Política & Sociedade, 6(10), 153–172. DOI: 10.5007/%25x

Allern, S., & Blach-Ørsten, M. (2011). The news media as a political institution – a Scandinavian perspective. Journalism Studies, 12(1), 92–105. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2010.511958

Al‐Najjar, A. (2019). Bias. The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies, 1–6. DOI: 10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0081

Alves Filho, F. (2006). A autoria institucional nos editoriais de jornais. Alfa, 50(1), 77–89. Retrieved from

periodicos.fclar.unesp.br/alfa/article/view/1396

Ansolabehere, S., Lessem, R., & Snyder, J. (2006). The orientation of newspaper endorsements in US elections, 1940-2002. Quarterly Journal Political Science, 1(4), 393–404. DOI: 10.1561/100.00000009

Artemas, K., Vos, T., & Duffy, M. (2018). Journalism hits a wall. Journalism Studies, 19(7), 1004–1020. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2016.1249006

Azari, J. (2016). How the news media helped do nominate Trump. Political Communication, 4(33), 677–680. DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2016.1224417

Azevedo, F. (2017). A Grande Imprensa e o PT: 1989-2014. São Carlos: EDUFSCar.

Barnhurst, K., & Nerone, J. (2008). Journalism History. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The Handbook of Journalism Studies (pp. 17–28). New York: Routledge.

Bauer, M. (2002). Análise de conteúdo clássica. In M. Bauer, & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som (pp. 189–217). Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.

Biroli, F., & Miguel, L. F. (2013). Meios de comunicação, voto e conflito político no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 28(81), 77–95. DOI: 10.1590/S0102-69092013000100006

Charles, M. (2019). Advocacy Journalism. The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies, online first, 1–5. DOI: 10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0116

Clayman, S., & Reisner, A. (1998). Gatekeeping in Action. American Sociological Review, 63(2), 178–199. DOI: 10.2307/2657322

Columbia University Libraries (1964, March). Interview – John B. Oakes. http://www.columbia.edu/cu/lweb/digital/collections/nny/oakesjb/toc.html

Cook, T. (2006). The news media as a political institution. Political Communication, 23(2), 159–171. DOI: 10.1080/10584600600629711

Day, A., & Golan, G. (2005). Source and content diversity in Op-Ed pages. Journalism Studies, 6(1), 61–71. DOI: 10.1080/1461670052000328212

De Vreese, C. (2005). News framing. Information Design Journal, 13(1), 51–62. DOI: 10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre

Dias, A. B. (2019). “Por si só esse jornal se acabou”: Jornalismo profissional, política e autoridade em tempos de “pós-verdade”. Proceedings from VIII Compolítica. Recuperado de compolitica.org/novo/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/gt8_Dias.pdf

Druckman, J., & Parkin, M. (2005). The impact of media bias. The Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1030–1049. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00349.x

Eilders, C. (1999). Synchronization of issue agendas in news and editorials of the prestige press in Germany. Communications, 24(3), 301–328. DOI: 10.1515/comm.1999.24.3.301

Espinosa, P. (2003). Géneros para la persuasión en prensa. Ámbitos, n. 9–10, 225–238. Retrieved from idus.us.es/xmlui/handle/11441/12698

Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics with SPSS. London: Sage.

Firmstone, J. (2008). The editorial production process and editorial values as influences on the opinions of the british press towards Europe. Journalism Practice, 2(2), 212–229. DOI: 10.1080/17512780801999378

Firmstone, J. (2019). Editorial Journalism and Newspapers’ Editorial Opinions. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, online first, 1–24. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.803

Fontcuberta, M. (1993). La Noticia: Pistas Para Percibir El Mundo. Barcelona: Paidós.

Gomes, W. (2012). Entrevistas com candidatos a presidente transmitidas ‘ao vivo’ em telejornais. Revista Compolítica, 2(2), 5–26. DOI: 10.21878/compolitica.2012.2.2.29

Graber, D. (2003). The media and democracy. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 6, 160–169. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085707

Guerreiro Neto, G. (2016). Da opinião à identidade. Sobre Jornalismo, 5(2), 92–105. Retrieved from surlejournalisme.com/rev/index.php/slj/article/view/176

Hallin, D. (1992). Sound bite news. Journal of communication, 42(2), 5–24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00775.x

Hanitzsch, T. (2007). Deconstructing journalism culture. Communication Theory, 17(4), 367–85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00303.x

Hanitzsch, T., & Vos, T. (2017). Journalistic roles and the struggle over institutional identity. Communication Theory, 27(2), 115–135. DOI: 10.1111/comt.12112

Harcup, T., & O’Neill, D. (2016). What is news? Journalism Studies, 18(12), 1470–1488. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2016.1150193

Hopmann, D., Van Aelst, P., & Legnante, G. (2011). Political balance in the news, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 240–257. DOI: 10.1177/1464884911427804

Kahn, K., & Kenney, P. (2002). The slant of the news. American Political Science Review, 96(2), 381–394. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/3118032

Kaplan, R. (2006). The news about new institutionalism. Political Communication, 23(2), 173–185. DOI: 10.1080/10584600600629737

Maras, S. (2013). Objectivity in journalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Marques, F. P. J., & Mont’Alverne, C. (2019). What are newspapers’ editorials interested in? Journalism, online first, 1–19. DOI: 10.1177/1464884919828503

Marques, F. P. J., Miola, E., Mitozo, I., & Mont’Alverne, C. (2019). Similar, but not the same: Comparing Editorial and News Agendas in Brazilian Newspapers. Journalism Practice, online first, 1–21. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2019.1684833

Marques, F. P. J., Vimieiro, A., Vieira, A. & Melo, S. (2009). O Fórum na Tela. Contemporânea, 7(1), 1–28. Retrieved from portalseer.ufba.br/index.php/contemporaneaposcom/article/view/3604/2672

Mast, J., Coesemans, R., & Temmerman, M. (2016). Hybridity and the news. Journalism, 18(1), 3–10. DOI: 10.1177/1464884916657520

McCombs, M. (2005). A look at Agenda-setting. Journalism Studies, 6(4), 543–557. DOI: 10.1080/14616700500250438

Meltzer, K. (2007). Newspaper editorial boards and the practice of endorsing candidates for political office in the United States. Journalism, 8(1), 83–103. DOI: 10.1177/1464884907072422

Melo, J. M., & Assis, F. (2016). Gêneros e formatos jornalísticos. Intercom – RBCC, 39(1), 39–56. DOI: 10.1590/1809-5844201613

Miguel, L. F. (2003). A eleição visível. Dados, 46(2), 289–310. DOI: 10.1590/S0011-52582003000200004

Mont’Alverne, C., Athanásio, E., & Marques, F. P. J. (2018). The journalist between the profession and the newspaper’s interests. Brazilian Journalism Research, 14(2), 384–411. DOI: 10.25200/BJR.v14n2.2018.1088

Mont’Alverne, C., & Marques, F. P. J. (2019). News Production Routines. The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies, online first, 1–7. DOI: 10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0238

Mundim, P. S. (2014). Cobertura da imprensa e eleições presidenciais de 2006. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 29(86), 91–107. DOI: 10.1590/S0102-69092014000300007

Nava, M., & Marques, F. P. J. (2019). From “Leftist” To “President”. Journalism Practice, online first, 1–22. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2019.1587640

Page, B. (1996). The mass media as political actors. PS: Political Science and Politics, 29(1), 20–24. DOI: 10.2307/420185

Peters, B. (1999). Institutional Theory in Political Science – “The New Institutionalism”. Londres and New York: Pinter.

Pimentel, P. S. (2019). “Não vai mesmo ter golpe”: um estudo sobre os editoriais de O Globo nos impeachments de Fernando Collor (1992) e Dilma Rousseff (2016) (master thesis). Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba. Retrieved from acervodigital.ufpr.br/handle/1884/65967

Porto, M. (2012). Media Power and Democratization in Brazil. Nova York: Routledge.

Pozobon, R., & Schaefer, R. (2015). Perspectivas contemporâneas das pesquisas sobre enquadramento. Interin, 19(1), 120–135. Retrieved from seer.utp.br/index.php/i/article/view/123

Rubim, A. (2001). Novas configurações das eleições na idade mídia. Opinião Pública, 7(2), 168–181. DOI: 10.1590/S0104-62762001000200002

Rutenbeck, J. (1994). The triumph of news over ideas in American journalism. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 18(1), 63–79. DOI: 10.1177/019685999401800104

Schudson, M., & Anderson, C. (2009). Objectivity, Professionalism, and Truth Seeking in Journalism. In K. Wahl-Jorgensen, & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The Handbook of Journalism Studies (pp. 88–101). New York: Routledge.

Seixas, L. (2013). Teorias de jornalismo para gêneros jornalísticos. Galáxia, (25), 165–179. Retrieved from www.scielo.br/pdf/gal/v13n25/v13n25a14.pdf

Sparrow, B. (2006). A research agenda for an institutional media. Political Communication, 23(2), 115–157. DOI: 10.1080/10584600600629695

Tandoc Jr., E. & Vos, T. (2016). The journalist is marketing the news. Journalism Practice, 10(8), 950–966. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2015.1087811

Thesen, G. (2017). An intervening intermediary. In P. Van Aelst, & S. Walgrave (Eds.). How political actors use the media (pp. 21–38). [s.l.]: Palgrave MacMillan.

Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2017). Information and Arena. In P. Van Aelst & S. Walgrave (Eds.), How political actors use the media (pp. 1–19). [s.l.]: Palgrave MacMillan.

Ward, S. J. (2019). Truth and Truthfulness. The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies, online first, 1–5. DOI: 10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0098

Weber, M. H. (1990). Pedagogias de despolitização e desqualificação da política brasileira (as telenovelas da Globo nas eleições de 1989). Comunicação & Política, 9(11), 67–83. Retrieved from www.danielherz.com.br/system/files/acervo/ZE+MIGUEL/As+Eleicoes+Presidenciais+de+1989+nas+Telenovelas+da+Globo+%28Pedagogias+de+Despolitizacao+e+Desqualificacao+da+Politica+Nacional%29.pdf

Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.

 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.